„Haptic“ können sie. Die „Taptic Engine“ bleibt im Verhältnis zur Telefongröße auch ein Bauteil, das nicht unerheblich viel Platz einnimmt.
Mit diesem Rütteln und Schütteln untermalt man sicherlich keinen ganzen Film. Dieser spezielle TV-App-Trailer funktioniert jedoch als clevere Promo-Idee, weil man ihn sowieso am iPhone schaut.
Dies sind einige Artikel, denen ich mich heute gewidmet habe und die ich für empfehlenswert erachte.
Google I/O was AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI. Apple's WWDC was UI, UI, UI, UI, UI, UI.
Can you imagine if the new "Liquid Glass" UI hadn't leaked ahead of time, for example? Or even the silly new naming scheme? These would have been big, topical stories that could have helped Apple distract from what is going on internally with AI. I'm not saying I feel badly that this is happening to them, I'm just saying it's wild that they have not been able to stop it. And such a leaky boat is never a good sign of overall company health, of course.
„Apple Tries to Hide AI Under Liquid Glass“ | M.G. Siegler
Speaking of Apple’s models, they’ve been updated, and Apple is opening them up much more broadly. App developers have direct access to the smaller on-device model, with relatively free rein to build features based on it. Even more impressive is the latitude being given to actions in Shortcuts on the Mac, which can use the on-device model, Apple’s Private Cloud Compute, or even ChatGPT to perform tasks and return data. (It’s interesting that individual Shortcut developers get access to Private Cloud Compute before app developers do.)
„Apple Intelligence shifts gears“ | Jason Snell
I'm all for fun in these events, but the heavily choreographed, totally risk averse, perfectly edited speeches, and the like have stripped the humanity and dynamism of Apple's keynotes. The humour feels stilted — possibly even tone deaf — and the messaging continues to speak volumes with all the topics it ignores.
I'm not looking for them to step into political/cultural conversations, but, within their ecosystem, perhaps some more words toward developers would be welcome.
„WWDC 2025“ | Matt Alexander
I’m glad Apple finally added the ability to set default apps for file types. It wasn’t on any of my iPad feature wishlists, but it should have been. It’s a strong addition.
Putting folders in the Dock, on the other hand, feels like macOS intruding too much into the unique iPad experience. I would have loved to seen a more unique solution, like a corner gesture to bring up the Files app or a specific folder.
„iPadOS 26 Walks the Line Between iPad and Mac“ | Riley Hill
The thing I need to dig into though is how much I adore the new Liquid Glass visual refresh. It honestly looks a little shitty, but it looks a little shitty in a way that feels like a group of designers with strong opinions made and then committed to a bold decision. This is the kind of act 2025 Apple needs a lot more of these days, and it’s the kind of act that brought us iOS 7 which also looked a little bit shitty at launch. But also like the launch of iOS 7, the overall feeling of newness associated with the Liquid Glass design language evokes an emotional response which — at least in my eyes — supersedes what we’ve come to know as a pure common sense design perspective.
„Someone at Apple Has a Real Opinion About Design Again, Thank God“ | Brendon Bigley
My hope is that there will be time in this beta run for enough fixes to be made. My fear is that many of us will be waiting months for a fully usable OS, if that ever occurs. So, sure, argue against what I and others are concerned about. State, correctly, that Apple is a leader in accessibility. But stop assuming that just because this new design might be OK for you and because Apple has controls in place that might help people avoid the worst effects of design changes, everything is just peachy. Because it isn’t. Millions of people are now a coin flip away from whether or not they’ll be able to comfortably use their devices in just a few short months from now.
„Liquid Glass: Apple vs accessibility“ | Craig Grannell
Liquid glass looks like the product of a design process led by someone saying "Make it look good." I'm sure it "works" fine. But I'm not sure what it is meant to do that its predecessor did not.
How much does any of this matter? Even on this uncertain footing, Apple remains a monolith. Most people rarely switch device ecosystems, and even Google has yet to figure out an AI feature powerful enough to spur large groups of iPhone owners to trade them in for Pixels.
Apple still has plenty of new widgets it can show off. But the vision behind all that activity feels a little muddy — and the company's rivals, including Google and OpenAI, seem to have a much stronger idea of what they are doing. Apple can still do great things — but for now, it seems fixated on the low-hanging fruit.
„Apple is shipping through it“ | Casey Newton
The other part of this that I find interesting is that the new design system is pretty darn opinionated. This is not just a neutral system where devs lead the way in terms of design trends, nor is it another slight refinement to the OS design they've been iterating one since iOS 7, it's got a clear opinion on what software design is for the next 10 years should look like. The challenge with opinionated design is that it's really hard to do when you have 1 billion users; the safe thing to do is to be generic and slowly iterate on what you already have. It's like flipping a house, painting all the walls white, and staging it with the most generic furniture you can find so as not to impart any personality or offend the sensibilities of anyone who walks in the front door.
It's objectively easier to keep iterating on what you already had, Apple didn't do that here, and at a very core level I'm excited that they took a big swing. Now let's hope they spend the summer refining this thing.
„Everyone says they want opinionated design until they get it“ | Matt Birchler
To that end, while I understand why many people were underwhelmed by this WWDC, particularly in comparison to the AI extravaganza that was Google I/O, I think it was one of the more encouraging Apple keynotes in a long time. Apple is a company that went too far in too many areas, and needed to retreat. Focusing on things only Apple can do is a good thing; empowering developers and depending on partners is a good thing; giving even the appearance of thoughtful thinking with regards to the App Store (it’s a low bar!) is a good thing. Of course we want and are excited by tech companies promising the future; what is a prerequisite is delivering in the present, and it’s a sign of progress that Apple retreated to nothing more than that.
„Apple Retreats“ | Ben Thompson
Ein Redesign muss erst übers Ziel hinausschießen, damit man es dann zurückdrehen kann. Ich hatte befürchtet, dass Apple sich nicht weit genug aus dem Fenster lehnt – auch deshalb, weil sie erstmals alle Plattformen gleichzeitig bespielen.
Oh, boy. Das war eine unbegründete Sorge. Aber die Wahl fürs „Material“ ist vielversprechend und denkt bereits einige Hardware-Jahre in die Zukunft.
Erzwingen Webdienste als zweite Bestätigung eine klassische SMS-Textnachricht (anstelle von Einmalcodes in eurer Passwort-App oder Passkeys), markiere ich mir das im Kennwort-Notizfeld – um’s später auf eine geschütztere Methode umzustellen.
Autofill-SMS sind in Safari sehr bequem. Diese Bequemlichkeit lässt sich mit 2FHey (zuvor „Ohtipi“) für andere Browser nachstellen. Es kopiert schlicht den per Textnachricht eintreffenden Code in die Zwischenablage (vorausgesetzt ihr erlaubt der Hintergrund-App den Zugriff auf eure iMessage-Datenbank).
2FHey looks for incoming texts with OTP codes in them and copies the code to your clipboard along with a notification. Everything happens locally and nothing is ever sent to a server.
Kürzlich habe ich meine Eltern ins eigene Tailscale-Konto eingebunden. Der Komfort, verglichen mit TeamViewer und Co., ist in unserer semi-häufigen Nutzung gigantisch. Die Deinstallation der vorherigen Fernwartungssoftware zog meine Mundwinkel unbeabsichtigt nach oben.
Die Computer meiner Eltern zeigen sich nun direkt in Screens neben dem eigenen Mac. Im Supportfall sind sie lediglich einen Klick entfernt.
Seit letzter Woche schiebt Screens auch bequem Dateien.
File transfers are no longer limited to the Mac. With Screens 5.6, you can now drag and drop files between your Mac and your iPhone, iPad, or Vision Pro during a session. Whether you’re retrieving documents or sending files to your remote Mac, it’s fast, intuitive, and secure.
Am iPad ziehe ich zwei Apps nebeneinander; am iPhone drag-und-droppe ich aus der Files-App. Um umgekehrt eine Datei von einem entfernten Mac zu besorgen, ziehe ich sie mit der Maus auf den automatisch erscheinenden Download-Pfeil. Das kleine Transferfenster bietet dann einen Direktlink in meinen lokalen Dateienordner, in den das Dokument übertragen wurde (➝ On My iPad/iPhone ➝ Screens ➝ Downloads).
Es ist so wohltuend, dass das neue Design (bis jetzt) nicht geleakt ist. Solche unvollständigen Informationshäppchen erklären nie die dahinterstehende Idee.
If skeuomorphic design is performative, and flat design is reductive, maybe Diamorph is something else entirely—less about illusion, more about belonging.
Whatever you call it, it’s clear something is shifting. We’ve felt it building for a while: Big Sur icons, the many -phism experiments, playful micro-interactions, richer lighting models—it’s been building in waves. But now it’s breaking through.
And with it, we finally get to move past the tired flat-vs-skeuo binary. It’s time to make space for something new.
Morgen hoffe ich auf eine Vision, die den Platz, den die Computer bei uns allen einnehmen, treffender repräsentiert.
„Skeuomorphic design“ war vertraut; „Flat design“ funktional. Sebastiaan de With nimmt das lesenswert auseinander.
Die nächste Dekade wird jedoch ein Interface begleiten müssen, das omnipräsente (AI-)Begleiter berücksichtigt, die unsere verschiedensten Geräte viel intimer machen.
Hoffentlich ist dafür „Liquid Glass“ nicht zu kühl, steril und abgebrüht.
Auf Musik folgen Podcasts, logisch. Mit Fokus auf Apps, „die Dinge anders denken“. Die, die „keinen Respekt vor dem Status quo haben“. „Die Rebellen. Die Querdenker. Die runden Pflöcke in den eckigen Löchern.“
Hier das Intro zur Episode: